Dossier Lippens

Ann en Eefje

Volgende analyse kadert in een algemeen onderzoek van de Dutroux diskettes.  

 Iedereen kent het verhaal van Ann en Eefje wel. De twee meisjes die te blankenberhe ontvoerd werden, gevangenzaten in een geheime kamer en uiteindelijk door toedoen van Dutroux vermoord werden.

Maar kent U de politieblunders die erbij werden begaan.? En waren het wel blunders, of moest de ware toedracht toegedekt worden. 

Zoals U misschien weet, of niet, werd indertijd het volledige Dutroux proces op diskette gezet en gelekt aan ... mensen buiten de politiediensten. Het boek van Douglas de Koning, Annemie bulté en van Heeswijck steunden zich daarop.

Maar die diskettes waren manueel geindexeerd. Nu zijn ze op adobe gezet en geautomatiseerd.  En het was niet het minste wat eruit kwam.  

de volgende analyse is opgemaakt aan de hand van de verschillende PV's die zich in dat dossier bevonden. De politiek en de politie intereseren er zich niet meer voor. Een dader is gepakt en de rest.... Wel ze zijn vrij. Maar over gans Europa zoeken personen nu naar de ontbrekende schakels. En analyseren ze de gegevens en toetsen ze deze aan andere schandalen.  Het onderzoek naar Ann en Eefje vormt daarvan een onderdeel.  Net zoals het onafhankelijk onderzoek naar de betrokkenheid van de gebroeders Lippens er een onderdeel van vormt.

Het dossier X1 is momenteel (2008) nog steeds niet afgesloten, maar het zweeft in limbo. Het is alsof er een vloek op rust; Geen enkele onderzoeksrechter durft het aan om het dossier aan te nemen. Niettemin wordt het onderzocht en langzaamerhand komen meer en meer zaken aan het licht die duidelijk wijzen dat het verhaal van de X getuigen ZEER ernstig moet worden genomen.  Maar zoalang de politie weigert om  de nieuwe gegevens te onderzoeken, laat staan te aanvaarden kan men enkel stellen: WAAROM  DEZE TEGENWERKING - MAG DE WAARHEID MAG NIET boven komen.

Iedereen is vrij zijn eigen mening te hebben.  

Veel leesgenot. 


 

 

 The story of Ann and Eefje  at a Farm in Blankenberhe. Police malfunction or Cover up.

Documents used:

1.      PV 3378/96 – dated 27.08.1996

Informant informs police of Blankenberhe of the possible whereabouts of ann and eefje at a local farm and give quite a lot of details.)

2.      PV 113892/96  - dated 24.09.1996

Based on PV 3378/96  the police of Neufchateau goes to Blankenberghe and starts investigation of the farm. It is asserted that persons with connections to the milieu are connected to the farm. It is deemed necessary to investigate the farm.

3.      PV 114675/96  - dated 01.10.1996 

Report of that investigation by the investigators of Neufchateau. They were assisted by Lab policemen depending on Bruges district.  Because of the findings at the Farm it was deemed necessary to do further, more detailed investigation. 

4.      PV 2037/96 – dated 01.10.1996 

Asked by the cel of Neufchateau , the police districk of Bruges send to Labo policemen to help them. It was they who collected the evidence, inventoried it and kept it at their station.  Their findings were DIFFERENT of those of NEUFCHATEAU. And those differences got LOST in Neufchateau  

5.      PV 115023/6 – dated 09.10.96

The 1st of October they also did a housesearch of Lefrancks house in Blankenberghe. 

6.      PV 100525/96  dated 15.11.1996  

According to this PV Hair of ann and eefje was found in the car of Diakostavrianos. (A GREEK) 

7.      PV 10054/98 – dated  22.01.1998

Recuperation of the subject found at the farm  5taken from Blakenberghe to Neufchateau)

8.      02.02.1998 – addendum written by Langois and attached to  PV 113892/96  dated 24.09.1996)                               

Here Langois, by REREADING some of his reports mention a possible link between  a something the informer mentioned in PV 113892 and another case.  

 9.      28.12.2001 – Rapport synthese AA’ CC  Dutroux: page 118 to 123 (same info in AA’AA p. 847 – 853)

Short report used by the investigators to easily find back some links and information. Cru-cial information as found in  PV 2037/96 – dated 01.10.1996 is not used. (No mention a tall of this PV) 

10.   PV 101148/99 – dated 18.10.1998

Report of a search done by the police on persons in Charlerloi by using pictures of possibly  involved persons. With it. Pictures of DECHER Pierre and BECKER Thierry, first named in the PV 3378/96 – dated 27.08.1996


 


Under construction 

Let us now look at each PV separately. 

 1.      PV 3378/96 – dated 27.08.1996 In august 1996 an informant informs a police of Blankenberghe that he has information regarding the abduction of ann and eefje. The local police immediately makes a PV and notifies Neufchateau (Connerote).  In that PV, which is rather detailed there is mention of:

1.      A certain Becker, from CHARLEROI and know for arson, beatings, stealing and manslaughter. A very dangerous person.

2.      A Greek who told the informer that Ann and Eefje were taken to this farm

3.      The info that Becker has a girlfriend living in Ostend

4.      That the girls “might” have been taken to Charleroi and later to Germany (Aachen and Dusseldorf)

5.      There are strong links between Dutroux and Becker

6.      Becker is implicated in a hold-up in which a ramrod was used against armored car

7.      The father Marschal of the girls had already been intimidated

8.      A connection between the Haemers bende, a well know criminal gang.

The PV is immediately send to Conerotte and a special phone line is opened.One month later Neufchateau sends a some agents to Blankenberghe to check out the story.

 

2.      PV: 113892/96 – date 24.09.1996 In this  PV we learn that the agent Van de Putte Willy come to Blankenberghe and meets the informer. His subsequent report as stated in the PV 113892/96consists of 2 parts. One the info of the informer is checked and second a more thorough but discreet investigation is done of the farm.1.      The informer. He  is deemed very reliable (Digne de confiance) but who wants to stay anonymous.  All in all the information given by him is basically the same as in the first PV, but with the difference that he also mentions that the house is used by the milieu of Brugge as a transit  house for persons of the milieu. (it is not clear here if he means human trafficking or hide out for criminal), just that the house by criminal for people related to that milieu. The second new info that is given by the informer is that one of the persons at farm is someone who is one of the last people arrested in the case Dutroux. (The police later will think of a certain Charbonnier.) – However no PV is found which makes a link between this one and an eventual interrogation of Charbonnier. Only in the syntheses we find a reference that police thinks about this person. A third information which is given is that Nihoul is a know customer of a restaurant in Brugge, The owner of the restaurant has also a GREEK – ITALIAN name. 

3.      Investigation of the farm.

Basically here the owners and possible inhabitants are checked out.                Mainly find a Becker Pierre,  and Lefranck Ives.  The first one Is dangerous and also the second one is know by the police. Furthermore there a people of Slavic origin working at this place.A local farmer is contacted and he declares that he saw dubious figures on the farm and that there was some digging going on with a crane. (PV All in all the info collected was found important enough to ask for a more detailed, a Fouille or excavation  research on the farm :

DEVOIRS DEMANDES :Nous poursuivons l'enquête en vue de tenter d'identifier le domicile et l'identité de la petite amie du nommé BECKER Pierre à OSTENDE, Rue Christina. Dès que ces renseignements seront en notre possession, nous rédigerons d'initiative un procès-verbal subséquent au présent relatant ceux-ci. Au vu des éléments développés dans le présent procès-verbal,il serait nécessaire d'obtenir les devoirs suivants :- Une ordonnance de perquisition pour la fermette située à * 8421 DE KAAN(VLISSEGEM), Vijfwegestraat nr 024.

Nous laissons à l'appréciation de Monsieur le Juge d'Instruction CONNEROTTE de l'opportunité d'effectuerune fouille approfondie du terrain:en requérant les moyens nécessaires au bon déroulement de l'enquête),celui-ci ayant subit des transformations, notamment au moyen d'une grue durant la période Aoüt-septembre 1995. * Il serait nécessaire de requérir le soutien dulaboratoire de Police Judiciaire de BRUGES, et ce aux fins de relever les traces d'empreintes exploitables etde par ce fait tenter d'identifier les personnes ayant transiter par cette fermette.Nous avons pris contact avec un des membres de ce service qui est le nommé VAN DE PITTE Yvan Ce dernier nous déclare être disponible le 01/10/96. 

Now this brings us to the investigation of the farm.  However, in the last sentence we read that for a sucesfull search of the house, help is needed . They Phone Van De Pitte Ivan of the bruges police and who is a member of the Police du LOBA.  ( Belgian equivalent in that time of CSI.  One thing is rather strange here, Neufchateau asks the help of the local CSI, but will not use their findings afterwards. ? 

          Let have look now at the next PV’s, namely   nr 3        PV 114675/96  - dated 01.10.1996 and  nr. 4. PV 2037/96 – dated 01.10.1996The first PV , 114675/96 was written by the investigators of Neufchateau and the second one by the Labo police of Brugge.  All in all the same info was written down , but with the Bruges one mentions the findings of HAIR and FRESH car traces.  But before we consider this, let us look closer at the finding themselves.

1.      First, as the earlier PV, leading to this search asked for a detailed excavation of the premises, nothing of the sort was done. Probably because of the time period. Only 3 days to find a digging crane.  OK, we can accept that, but even when the investigators find a closed door, they do not force it.?  Maybe again, because they will come back another time, they do not insist in a more detailed search of the buildings and underground. They only search the open rooms and accessible locations on the farm. However, what they find is most interesting and confirms the sayings of the informer.

a.      The find a Cagoule (Headgear usually used in cold weather but also as protection against recognition during criminal activities.

b      They find clothes

c.      Cigarette butts

d.      And drawing singed by Becker P and Becker T. (By coincidence Becker Pierre  has a brother, name Becker Thierry)

e.      They find 2 HAIRS on the outside of the cagoule and there are some Fresh Tire traces in front of the house.  

But this last info is only reported in the Bruges PV, not in the PV of Neufchateau ? Mistake, or ……. 

Considering all strange things happening in the Dutroux case, one cannot other than ask himself some questions.? Nevertheless, the investigators of Neufchateau find their findings intresting enough to ask for a more detailed search, so most probably it it just a HUGE professional mistake. They did not countercheck their findings with those of the labo of Bruges. And this very in itself very strange because in the first place the agents of Neufchateau asked the Help of Bruges.

2.  Page 25 of the PV 114675/96 of 01.10.96

a.       Exposons que la persqisition s’est déroulée sans incident, la porte du garage qui était ouverte et qui nous avais permis l’acces à la maison à été repoussée comme a notre arrive.

b.      Exposons q’un examen plus approfondit de l’etang, des citernes et des tas de gravats pourrait etre envisage. Nous laissons ces devoirs a l’appréciation du Magistrat instructeur.

c.       Exposons que la cagoule, le manteau de l’armée ainsio que le bloc de feuilles blaches sur lequel figurqit divers dessins nous laissent a penser que l’informationayant nécessité notre intervention était exacte, et ce au vu des mentions existe tand sur ce block soit Pierre B et Thierry B. (Qui pourrait appartenir au nommé Pierre Becker.) 

In Flemish they :  De pap is in de mond gegeven. (Its presented on a plate)

The investigators actually ask for a more detailed investigation because they found enough proof.   Unfortunately, after this almost NOTHING. –. The only thing the police does, on orders from Conerotte is that the investigate and the house of Lefracq at Blankenberghe. (PV 115023/96 (Perquisition maison Lefrancq).   

A strange item however is that at the end of this PV there is an addendum dated 26.01.199, in which Langlois asks for a number of PV dated between 06.11.1996 and 20.12.196 referring to Dossier 86/96 which however disappeared from the original Files.

But , Dossier 86/96 is the Dossier were the investigation about the farm is all about.PROCES-VERBAL D'INFORMATION

Dossier : 86196  Nous, J. LANGLOIS, Juge d'instruction, près le Tribunal de première instance deNeufchâteau, rapportons ce qui suit :- en date du 18 janvier dernier, M. LEMAIRE, greffier d'instnuction en notre cabinet Nousfait part de ce que, dans le cadre d'une recherche ponctuelle de procès-verbaux, elle a constaté la "disparition" de pièces originales du dossier de la procédure. Celles-ci y ont figuré puisque :- détaillées et inventoriées sous les numéros 3866 86.01432 à 3937 86.01492 et- en leur temps, copiées, en différents exemplaires dont ceux mis à la disposition desdétenus du dossier dans le cadre de sa lecture mensuelle en vue de leur compamtion enchambre du conseil.- Madame LEMAJRE Nous signale avoir procédé à la vérification du contenu des fardescopiées contenant lesdites pièces et avoir constaté que les originaux ne s'y trouvaient pas.- des recherches seront également effectuées dans les autres cartons composant le dossier,sans plus de succès.- il est difficile, voire impossible, de déterminer la cause de cette "disparition" d'originauxSur quoi, Nous réclamons aux différentes unités verbalisatrices une copie certifiée conformedes procès-verbaux manquants que nous placerons en lieu et place de leur original et enfonction du numéro d'inventaire qui leur avait été attribué a l'époque.Dont acteNeufchâteau, le 27 janvier 1999Missing :

PV 1O0463196 du 06.11.96

PV 100597196 du 03.12.96

PV 100556196 du 03.1296

PV 100631196 du 04.12.96

PV 100619196 du06.12.96

PV100632196 du 06.12.96

PV 100622196 du 12.12.96

PV100623196 du 12.12.96

PV 100624196 du 12.12.96

PV 100656196 du 16.12.96

PV 1 OO67OI96 du 20.12.96 

NO excavation, no research into Becker, nobody looks for a GREEK,  No leads are done to check out Nihoul and the Brugge restaurant, Nothing.??

Oh yes,  2 years later, when rereading the dossier, Langlois asks for information about the attack on the armored car ? (see page 7)The question is: Who decided NOT to investigate anymore?  Connerote ? I do not thinks so, because he was thrown out of the investigation the 14 October.  So that leaves us Langlois. Because as a responsible of then investigation it is his job to follow up any lead. And here we have HARD and strong evidence. But it is not all Langois is responsible  for.All info on those PV is actually forgotten.

However we find some of it them back in working document made by 1 MDL. Vernon on which we find a date 28.12.2001.  But on that document no trace of any reference to the BRUGES PV. (The one with the hair findings.). And one could say that this is at least very strange, because in January 19918 , all evidence collected by Brugge is returned to Neufchateau.

Ce jourd'hui 22/01/1998 à 15.30 heures NOLE soussigné (s) VERMEERSCH FRANCIS, MARECHAL DES LOGIS CHEF Officier de Police Judiciaire, Auxiliaire du Procureur du Roi DE MEULEMEESTER PETER, MARECHAL DES LOGIS de Gendarmerie, en résidence à NEUFCHATEAU, en tenue civile, porteur de la carte d'identité de service,portons à la connaissance de votre office ce qui suit : Ce jour, aux date et heure susmentionnées, faisant suite à l'apostille 86-96-672 du dossier 86/96, datée du 19.01.98, certifions avoir exécuté en partie la commission rogatoire dont question. Les pièces saisies le 27.08.96 par le Laboratoire de la Police Judiciaire de BRUGGE sous le couvert du procès-verbal 18192/96 et dont l'inventaire se trouve en annexe (9700274) ont été rapatriées du Greffe du Tribunal Correctionnel de BRUGGE vers le Greffe du Tribunal Correctionnel de NEUFCHATEAU, ce jour . En ce qui concerne les pièces saisies le 01.10.96 par ce même Laboratoire de le Police Judiciaire de BRUGGE, sous le couvert du procès-verbal 20307/96 et dont l'inventaire se trouve en annexe (9604581), elles ont été rapatriées du Greffe du Tribunal Correctionnel de BRUGGE vers le Greffe du Tribunal Correctionnel de NEUFCHATEAU le 24.09.97 par le lMDL VANDERMEER de la Cellule NEUFCHATEAU. Cette dernière partie a fait l'objet du procè-verbal 100909/97 du 24.09.97 de la Cellule NEUFCHATEAU.

According to this document, we can deduct that Neufchateau KNOWS  about the  PV in BRUGGE, because it is mentioned here, and they want the evidence , So, why did nobody bother to read it? It becomes even more strange considering that one month and half later we find Langlois asking for some information regarding what is written in the 1st PV 1113892/96 concerning the info of the informant?  He actually asks about  a information he finds in the file: namely  the attack on an armored money car.? 

1.       02.02.1998 – addendum written by Langois and attached to  PV 113892/96  dated 24.09.1996

Dossier 86/96 ( Procédant à la relecture du dossier, je constate que le PV n° 113892/96 du 24.09.1996  fait état de renseignements ayant trait à l’attaque de Fourgon qui s’est produite courant 1996 sur l’arrondissement de Nivelles et dans laquelle etait impliqué un belier.  

This is also strange because already in a PV 100306/96 and in PV 2662 of 19.09.196 Charbonnier , 2 years before Langlois finds this information in his dossiers the guy is interrogated and facts according to his person are written down. Actually, he is already arrested for this crime. And all in all there are about 389 pages of PV’s in whose name you find Charbonnier. 

If langois read his dossiers, how come he missed 389 pages on Charbonnier. !!! Note : And another thing: He is rereading the dossier in February 1998, at a date in which there is no talk of any disappearance of files pertaining to Dossier 86/96.So, if there were references to BECKER PIERRE and more regarding the farm, there should be a mention of it. But no. There is nothing.

Première suite au PV no 100306/96 d u 14.10.1996 de la Cellule Disparitions - Antenne deCHARLEROI. RENSEIGNEMENTS

Le nommé CHARBONNIER Patrice est connu de nos services pour vols. Il a été arrêtéle 05.09.1996 par la Police Judiciaire de NIVELLES pour une attaque sur fourgon SECURiTASdans la nuit du 19 au 20 Juin 1996. Ces faits font l'objet du dossier Parquet noNI.11.34.100536196 et du dossier no 81196 de monsieur le Juge d'Instruction MAES duTribunal de Première Instance de NIVELLES. Il se trouve actuellement sous Mandat d'Arrêt enla prison de JAMIOULX.Dans le cadre de nos enquêtes, nous portons à votre connaissance que dans le PV no106609 / 94 du 12.07.1994 de la brigade de CHARLEROI ( transmis au Parquet de CHARLEROI dans le cadre du dossier Parquet no CH.17.07.21327193 et mis à l'instruction dans le dossier 1003193 auprès de monsieur le Juge d'Instruction LORENT, à charge de DUTROUX Marc ) se trouve une ( attestation N manuscrite d'une personne soussignée CHARBONNIER Patrice qui affirme avoir ramené d'ANVERS cinq ventilateurs pour DUTROUX Marc. Ce dossier consistait à une enquête de vol au préjudice de VOZZELLA Rito. Nous précisons que le dossier Parquet CH.17.07.21327193 ainsi que le dossier NoCH.17.43.110892194 (concernant un vol qualifié commis également par DUTROUX Marc aupréjudice de CATINUS Fernand, né à COUVIN le 08.09.1939, administrateur de société,concubine de PESTIAUX Jeannine, Dlié à 6000 CHARLEROI rue de la Neuville no04/RC) quiont été instruits par monsieur LORENT , dossier 1003193 et dossier 1003193 (1261194) ont étéclôturés et transmis en renvoi correctionnel en date du 31.10.1995. Dans ces dossiers, il a étéretrouvé dans le domicile de DUTROUX Marc des objets provenant de ces vols, celui-ci atoujours nié être l'auteur du vol malgré ces faits. Dont acte. 

Now, this tells us that somebody asked more informations and it was given. Furtthermore, let us look at  the time frame. In the PV 3378/96 – dated 27.08.1996  an informer mentions a certain Becker Pierre who is involved in the LAST attack on the armored car in which a ram was used.  Charbonnier was arrested for this attack. And a RAM was effectively used.  That attack took place in the night of 19 – 20 June 1996.  Chardonnier was arrested the 05.09.1996, or 1 week after somebody spoke about that attack.   11 days later, on the 14.09.96 that  info was given to Neufchateau. This is only 2 weeks after the investigation of the farm and the finding of the “Cagoule”. One would think that a Bell would ring. But No – No link was made. Charbonnier was never asked if he new Becker.   All the more mysterious because his relationship with Dutroux is well know. They were long-time friends.

As also shown in following PV. PV. 2662 du 19.9.96 Aud. de CHARBONNIER. Il est incarcéré à Jamioulx dans le cadre de l'attaque d'un fourgon Sécuritas à Villers la Ville.Il parle de sa relation avec DUTROUX depuis sa jeunesse.II parle de son incarcération avec DUTROUX.Il parle de la volonté de DUTROUX en 92 d'aménager des caches dans la cave à Marcinelle.Il parle des travaux qu'il a réalisés pour ou avec DUTROUX.Il parle des voitures de DUTROUX.Il parle de sa fréquentation des clubs de tir et de son amour pour les armes.II parle du viol d'une jeune fille dans le sud de la France en août 92.

Let us now consider again his reading of PV 113892/96 in which the informer gives clear information’s and what Langois  DOES NOT INVESTIGATE

1.      BECKER PIERRE AND GIRLFRIEND: Notwithstanding demands of an investigation into them: No further investigation. Only twice his name comes up within the Dutroux files.

a.        Once in PV100833 97 dated  07.10.1997 in which Dutroux is asked if he knows him: answer: Les Dehon et les Becker, je connais pas et je ne sais pas ou il habitent.You cannot forget however that BECKER is from CARLEROI, and well know in the crime scene.

So how come Dutorux isn’t asked more about him. We Know Dutroux lies a lot. He changed the story about the abduction of an and eefje 3 times? So why no further questioning on BECKER.

b.        In PV 101148/99 when his picture is shown number  to a certain people, on of which was DIakostavrianos.

However the pictures were already taken in june 1997. 5PV 100453/98. The Beckers is a well Know criminal , a informer tell the police that inn his house children were kept prisoner, and the police does not even interrogate him. ??? However they have his picture? Did they interrogate him and lost the PV or was his picture already in their possession for other facts. If yes, how come it was only put in a file (PV 100453/97) in june 1997. ? and how come he got lost.   

2.      The Greek: “according to the informant: Lors du passage de ANN et EEFJE dans cette ferme, la ferme était occupée par un nommé BECKER Pierre. Cette information a été donnée à l'informateur par un grec qui était présent lors du passage de ANN et EEFJE dans la ferme. L'informateur déclare qu'il ne connaît pas ce grec par son nom et il ne sait pas comment le contacter. Actuellement, nous n'avons pas encore pu identifier ce grec. 

The informant gets his information from a GREEK. SO, as the police considers this info reliable, and based on what they  found they decide to investigate further, one can deduct that this GREEK knows something more. But nobody bothers to investigate this info any further. It becomes even more strange: By pure hazard you have a very well know GREEK connection with Dutroux  a certain  Diakosrtavrianos.  And he has a VAN and in that car  hair was found whom in first time was thought to be those of the girls. (PV 100525/96  dated 15.11.1996)  And there is also a witness who situates that VAN with 100% certainty  in Ostend at the period of the abduction.  The police will investigate the Van, and in end will dismiss the Ostend witness, and the fact that the VAN had been used. Diakosrtavianos got off the hook.  But again in the whole file, NO connection is made, or is even investigated as to try to find out who the GREEK in the Vlissegem story was.  But again page after page of info on Diakostavrianos, who by the way is considered pervert and wanted to steel children. ( Conclusions du tribunal de première instance de Neufchateau , page 18 and 24.). Also a short period before the adduction of ann and eefje Diakostavrianos sejourned in Germany and came back via a way which lead through Dusseldorf. (name of city named by the informant) 

3.      The Bruges Milieu.Cette ferme serait utilisée par le milieu criminel de BRUGES, pour faire transiter des personnes liées à ce milieu. 

If this is right, then the police should have interrogated the crime figures of the milieu in Bruges. The informant actually says that is is a regularly used transit place ???  So not just an ordinary farm. This is a information which actually is very important.?? You cannot disregard it.  

a.      Hotel Brazil. Now in Blankenberhe you had the Hotel Brazil, owned by a certain Marcel Marchal. And this man was know by Dutroux. And this man used Brasilian women as prostitutes. In fact he was put to trial because of a complaint , but as the girl was not at the trial he got of the hook.   PV 100575/99 – Marchal – Hotel Brazil

SYNTHESE DES INFORMATIONS RECUEILLIES- Le dossier BG.37.13.324196 est initié par une plainte de la nommée GUIMARAES SOUZA Marli, jeune femme brésilienne accueillie en début Mars 1996 par le couple MARCHAL-FERRERO à BLANKENBERGE (Hotel BRAZIL). GUIMARAES explique notamment que le couple MARCHALFERRERO était censé l'accueillir comme femme d'ouvrage à l'hôtel précité, mais qu'en réalité on lui propose rapidement des activités s'apparentant davantage à laprostitution. GUIMARAES refuse cette proposition et manifeste son désir deretourner au BRESIL. Lors de la visite domiciliaire effectuée le 05/03/96, des revues pornographiques et un vibra-masseur sont retrouvés chez MARCHAL-FERRERO. .Le couple MARCHAL-FERRERO parle quant à lui de GUIMARAES commed'une touriste et nie lui avoir proposé des activités de prostitution.- La plaignante GUIMARAES SOUZA Marli a quitté le temtoire belge pourretourner au Brésil le 26/03/96.  Cellule Enquéte de NEUFCHATEAU PV no 100575 199 du 19/1011999 Page N 2- Ce dossier a fait l'objet d'un jugement du Tribunal Correctionnel de BRUGES endate du 22/06/1998. Les préventions retenues à char-ge du couple MARCHALFERREROétaient :a. incitation à la débauche (pour MARCHAL et FERRERO)b. tentative d'incitation à la débauche (pour MARCHAL et FERRERO)c. importation illégale d'une arme à feu (pour MARCHAL)d. détention illégale d'une arme à feu (pour MARCHAL)- Selon le jugement précité, MARCHAL et FERRERO sont acquittés au bénéficedu doute des préventions a et b, MARCHAL étant condamné à un mois de prisonavec sursis de trois ans et une amende de 100 francs pour les préventions c et d.(copie de ce jugement figure en annexe au présent).- A lecture de ce dossier, et sous réserve d'une exploitation plus approfondie decertaines pièces nous remises en copie conforme par Mr le PR de BRUGES, nousn'avons pas a ce stade détecté d'indices probants quant à l'existence d'uneassociation ou organisation criminelle impliquant MARCHAL Marcel,FERRERO MARCHAL Patricia et l'un des inculpés du dossier 86/96.

Nicolo Mazzara, a witness, old friend of Mark Marchal and a friend of Dutroux states following when when asked if he knows the Hotel Brazil and what the intentions of the owner were:  

b. Connection with Dutroux.They also find a piece of paper whith his handwriting a tthe House of Marc Dutroux.    And its not finished yet. Through Mazzara Marschal knows BAUDSON.  And Baudson is the neighbor of Dutroux, and a neighbour who want to go to look for women and the one who said that the VAN of Diakostavrianos never moved from Dutorux place.?    

112.977 162 DIV AUDITION DE MARCHAL Marcel (07/03/57) 01/10 Présentation d'un doc. (ann au PV 112.405) DECKER Ce doc. lui fait penser à MAZZARAExploite hôtel BRAZIL depuis 1995Toujours gardé un contact avec MAZZARA (tél) Depuis 95 : MAZZARA plusieurs fois à l'hôtelMAZZARA lui a dit gagner sa vie avec des chipotages dans voituresMAZZARA séparé de CASIO FortunataFORTUNATA a peur de MAZZARA qui la bat quand il a buVacances 96 de FORTUNATA à l'hôtel BRAZILIL a rendu visite à MAZZARA et à sa famille à CHARLEROIFin 08/96 il MAZZARA a dit avoir été entendu dans l'affaire DUTROUXMAZZARA l'a amené 02 fois sur le terrain de DUTROUX à SARS avant06/96Il a reconnu le site sur photo aérienne de PARIS-MATCHMAZZARA l'avait amené dans un café voisinDans le café : conversation pour assurances et voituresDans ce café MAZZARA parlait avec BAUDSON FernandBAUDSON posséde une MERCEDES verte nouveau modèleMAZZARA est allé à BLANKENBERGE avec la MERCEDESMAZZARA est déjà allé en ITALIE avec BAUDSON

Dans le café BAUDSON a demandé à MARCHAL s'il pouvait lui trouver des femmes         

So, it goes on, but would you think that this is enough to make at least  some connections worthwhile to check out. Even if the same people come in view over and over, nothing. The police has completely forgotten to ask about the farm at Vlissegem.  Lets say, that the fact of forgetting the farm and not investigating  a possible connection  is the police mistake of the century , we have another huge blunder, or…..

4. The Irish Tourists.

In 1999,  2 Irish tourist present themselves as witnesses, after seeing Dutroux on television,  and state that they picked up Dutroux in the neighborhood of Brugge at the time of the disappearance of ann and eefje.  Dutroux told them that his car broke down and they drove him to Sars La Buissiere.  And this is corroborated by Dutroux.  One thing they also stated was that Dutroux stank of Fumier.  If one speaks about Fumier, the first thing you think about is a farm, because that is where you find Fumier.  And you have farm in your files.  You have information over a farm in which criminal items were found, where mysterious digging went on, which was owned by a criminal living in the same area as Dutroux and well know by the police, and you again forget it.  After having had a close look a the PV concerning the farm at Vlissgem

 Concerning the manure smell on Dutroux. There we have to bear in mind the time line. 1.      Dejonghe was informed by ? of the existence of the farm the 27.08.1996 pPV3378/962.      In September a perquisitions was asked3.      In October the perquisition was done, but only the insides and the lay-out of the house. Anomalies were remarked and additional investigation was asked.      In august 1997, one year later the  Irish mention Dutroux smelling of Manure. If the investigators  had had this info one year earlier, then things would have been different. But then again, if one receives any information about a suspect, even if it is a year later, the fact that he smells of manure  should have made someone thinking about a farm xxx .  Manure by the way because of its strong odor is ideal to hide things if you do not want dogs to smell it.  Hidden  cabin ? – Thinking –of that, what about the digging seen by the neighboring farmer ?

 ( xxx I remember a policeman telling me he managed to solve a murder attempt because of the smell in the house.  The wife told the police her husband had tried to kill her, by first trying to put her to sleep.  She managed to get away and called the police. So in the end it was her word against that of her husband. But  the first thing the police did when they arrived at the destination was to note the Hospital smell. This proved fatal for the husband, because the police , using this info looked for a possible strong smelling drug; They found it hidden away.)

Another thing: One of the policemen who was on this investigation and Perquisition (PV 114675/96) is one of the RE-READERS in de X-files of Regina Louf.  He supposedly  is one of the policeman who completely destroyed Regina witness.  So maybe we can ask the bad question  about him) In any case it would be interesting to find out info on the other policemen.   If we deal with a secret organization, then everyone is suspect. Even the investigating police. Especially the investigating police if BIG MISTAKES were made.